students to discuss the development, review or evaluation of an infection prevention and control resource appropriate to their practice. – Essaylink

Assessment 3: Written essay Word limit: 3000 words +/- 10%
APA 7 and Harvard is fine too.
students to discuss the development, review or evaluation of an infection prevention and control resource
appropriate to their practice. This could include a policy, procedure or education session. webinar may be
offered to discuss the requirements of this final assignment (assessment 3), and this is recorded and available
in the Assessment section of the Course for students who cannot participate in the live webinar. A critical
evaluation of an infection prevention and control practice, procedure, or policy Critically examine an
infection control practice, procedure or policy in your work area. Synthesizing your infection control
knowledge, safety and cost effectiveness & where appropriate, the need to respect cultural values – make
recommendations to improve practice. Describe how you will implement and evaluate these changes and take
appropriate action Please note if you are currently not employed, answer this question in relation to your
usual place of work/interest or your specialization. The purpose of this is to develop your ability from novice
to advance in the application and management of infection prevention and control specific to your
professional practice.
Essay Structure
As you will have seen in the previous webinar, using the following structure, is a requirement and will enable
you to address the requirements of the essay, and ensure you attend to each aspect of a critical evaluation
which is what the essay requires.
3/2/2021 63323 – Assessment 3: Written essay Word limit: 3000 words +/-
https://www.australiabesttutors.com/Recent_Question/63323/Assessment-3-Written-essay-Word-limit-3000-words– 3/4
INTRODUCTION
Provides a clear overview of why the improvement project was needed that conveys to the reader the
direction the assignment will take.
BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT
The aim/rationale of project are clearly described. This section mounts a convincing argument for the
intervention. Initial audit/observation against a known standard, guidance or the literature Includes detail of
the staffing and resources, project team, history of current practices and workplace readiness for this
improvement is discussed.
STRATEGY
The improvement strategy (intervention) is explained. Discussion and analysis of stakeholders, engagement,
implementation strategy for the intervention, analysis of barriers and obstacles and communication strategies
are outlined and justified
EVALUATION
Demonstrates understanding of how the intervention is/was evaluated or measured, includes discussion of
evaluation method, clearly identifying what the intervention is being measured against. Evaluation method
reflects the aims and objectives of the project.
CONCLUSION
Summarises and draws together the findings and outcomes of the project
There are another 20% of the marks taking the total to 100 for the quality of your evidence and expression.
See the marking grid on the previous page to understand how these sections are assessed.
References and Resources Australasian College of Infection Prevention and Control (ACIPC) (2020), last
accessed 5/11/2020, International Centre for Academic Integrity (2014), Fundamental values project, last
accessed 16/10/2019, https://www.academicintegrity.org/educational-resources/